I need this seldom enough to forget how it's done - but then it's annoying to have to think/google for the solution again when I do need it... So I'll document here.

The task is to generate uniformly distributed numbers within a circle of radius R in the (x,y) plane. At first polar coordinates seems like a great idea, and the naive solution is to pick a radius r uniformly distributed in [0, R], and then an angle theta uniformly distributed in [0, 2pi]. BUT, you end up with an exess of points near the origin (0, 0)! This is wrong because if we look at a certain angle interval, say [theta, theta+dtheta], there needs to be more points generated further out (at large r), than close to zero. The radius must not be picked from a uniform distribution, but one that goes as

pdf_r = (2/R^2)*r

That's easy enough to do by calculating the inverse of the cumulative distribution, and we get for r:

r = R*sqrt( rand() )

where rand() is a uniform random number in [0, 1]. Here is a picture:

some matlab code here.

The thinking for generating random points on the surface of a sphere in 3D is very similar. If I get inspired I will do a post on that later, meanwhile you can go read these lecture notes.

Why is pdf_r= (2/R^2)*r ?

In polar coordinates an infinitesimal area-element is: dr * r * dtheta

if we want points uniformly distributed in this area the pdf for r should "clearly" be proportional to r.

we also want the pdf to be normalized so that the integral from 0 to R of the pdf is 1. That leads to the pre-factor (2/R^2)

Thanks. I too made the mistake but realized later that it would be more concentrated closer to the origin.

Your code could be a lot more efficient by vectorizing instead of looping:

% prepare

Nmax = 1e3;

R = 5;

% Wrong

r1 = R*rand(Nmax,1);

theta1 = 2*pi*rand(Nmax,1);

x1 = r1.*cos(theta1);

y1 = r1.*sin(theta1);

% Right

r2 = R*sqrt(rand(Nmax,1));

theta2 = 2*pi*rand(Nmax,1);

x2 = r2.*cos(theta2);

y2 = r2.*sin(theta2);

% plot it

subplot(1,2,1);

plot(x1, y1, 'r.');

axis square

title('Left')

subplot(1,2,2);

plot(x2, y2, 'g.');

axis square

title('Right')

the vectoring instead of looping as shown by Evan is actually very effective to decrease the FLOPs of your code ...how ever i am getting the warning "Warning: Size vector should be a row vector with integer elements. "Warning: Size vector should be a row vector with integer elements. " for

r1 = R*rand(Nmax,1);

theta1 = 2*pi*rand(Nmax,1);

and

r2 = R*sqrt(rand(Nmax,1));

theta2 = 2*pi*rand(Nmax,1);

i know it can be ignored but its annoying me as to why am i getting it. any suggestions to overcome it?

Mariam: It's hard to say but my guess is you have something non-integer in the "Nmax" variable.

As the rest of you here sound to be either math professors/majors or at least much more mathmatically versed than myself can someone explain this in layman's terms and/or write a step by step guide as to where to put the radius, amount of points, etc an how to calculate it.

Thanks for the help! I had need of a uniform distribution inside an annulus (see the 'half-moon' classification in Neural Networks and Learning Machines by Haykin). Generalizing your result to the case of an annulus of inner radius A and outer radius B, I get

r = sqrt( rand() × (B^2 − A^2) + A^2 )