Canon 500D camera with EF-200/2.8L lens on EQ6 equatorial mount guided by a QHY5 camera and PHDGuiding. Stacked 5 frames in Deep Sky Stacker, total exposure ca 5 minutes. Shot on Sat-Sun night 23-24 Jan 2010 in cool -18 C but calm weather. Would have wanted longer exposures and more frames, but the guiding wasn't working very well, and Orion is pretty low, hiding behind trees from my site. The dark thing on the right is a tree
Same image but cropped:
A nice improvement over my 2008 December attempt on M42.
Someone better than me at astro-photo processing took my M31 RAW-data and processed it into this much better looking picture:
Anyone know any good astrophoto-processing tutorials? For GIMP?
A stack of four 10 minute exposures at iso400 through a 200 mm F5.6 lens. I really need to get a handle on processing these RAW frames for best results...
Autoguiding now seems to work quite well, here's a comparison between 10 min frames with guiding on/off:
More exposure is better, this one has about 40 min in total, previous attempts had only about 12 min and 8 min.
200mm F/5.6 lens. 20x60s exposure at iso3200.
200mm F/5.6 lens, 12x60s exposure at iso1600.
It seems like ages since the skies were clear last time. Must be around 2 months I think. Last evening however was good for astrophotography again. My target was the Orion nebula, or M42.
I took 40 sub-exposures, each 60s long, but half of them were out of focus , and a couple of the remaining ones had star-trailing due to vibration or me pushing the mount or something. The end result is a stack of 14 images, so 14 x 60s = 14min total exposure time. There is software out there to help with focusing, I'm looking at Nebulosity in particular. A DewNot dew-heater worked really well, no more problems with dew or frost on the lens.
Canon 20D wtih 70-400/4L lens set to 200mm and F/5.6: Unguided EQ-6 mount. Stacked with DeepSkyStacker with 10 dark frames (no flats or bias frames). The image above is a 100% crop, below is the full frame:
This site is about a 35min drive away. It allows exposing for 1-4 minutes at F/5.6. That's almost good enough, if you look at the "why autoguide" slides of Craig Stark's talk (especially the SNR plot at ca 7:20), it's clear that single exposures of a few minutes are required to reach good SNR.
The noise is supposed to be 1/sqrt(14)=3.7-fold lower in the stack above, but I'm not very impressed by how it looks compared to this single 60s frame:
The Pleiades shot with a Canon 20D and a 70-200/4L set to 73mm and F/5.6. A stack of 30 expousers, each 20s at iso800 (total exposure 30x20s = 10min). Unguided EQ-6 mount.
The Andromeda galaxy shot with a Canon 20D using a 70-200/4L lens set to 126mm and F/5.6. A stack of 17 frames at iso800, each exposed for 30 secods (total exposure 17x30s = 8.5 min). Unguided EQ-6 mount. A hint of M31's smaller companions M32 and M110 is visible.
A little left of Regulus and where Saturn is right now in Leo there's a group of three Messier objects: Two spiral galaxies M95 (magnitude 11.4), and M96 (magnitude 10.1), and an elliptical galaxy M105 (magnitude 10.2).
This is a stack of around ten 8 s exposures through an EF 70-200/4L set to 200mm and full aperture. Resolving details from the galaxies will require a longer focal length and much longer total exposure time. Focus is pretty good, and stars appear as points even in the corners - but the image shows severe vignetting. I need to learn how to use flat-frames to correct for that.
For those of you that don't spot the galaxies immediately from the pic above , below I've indicated their positions:
30s exposure at ISO400 of the Pleiades. Again some light clouds rolling in around 22:30 preventing further photos...