<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X-axis test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anderswallin.net/2008/04/x-axis-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anderswallin.net/2008/04/x-axis-test/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tero</title>
		<link>http://www.anderswallin.net/2008/04/x-axis-test/#comment-37844</link>
		<dc:creator>Tero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anderswallin.net/?p=266#comment-37844</guid>
		<description>The inverse deadband does it wrong. Dead band does not occur at DAC zero but at motor current zero crossing. So you would need at least current direction sensor to make it work properly. 

Maybe this is the reason for asymmetry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The inverse deadband does it wrong. Dead band does not occur at DAC zero but at motor current zero crossing. So you would need at least current direction sensor to make it work properly. </p>
<p>Maybe this is the reason for asymmetry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
