<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transformer test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anderswallin.net/2007/07/transformer-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anderswallin.net/2007/07/transformer-test/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tero</title>
		<link>http://www.anderswallin.net/2007/07/transformer-test/#comment-19804</link>
		<dc:creator>Tero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anderswallin.net/2007/07/transformer-test/#comment-19804</guid>
		<description>David LeVine had a good point in the previous post which might just explain this. At relatively low load, "duty cycle" of transformer may be for example 10%. So if you draw 1Amp, transformer sees 10A load at 10% duty cycle. That would equal 10x larger voltage drop compared to pure sinusoidal load which appears always as 100% duty cycle load.

PFC circuit can be used to rectify AC more efficiently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David LeVine had a good point in the previous post which might just explain this. At relatively low load, &#8220;duty cycle&#8221; of transformer may be for example 10%. So if you draw 1Amp, transformer sees 10A load at 10% duty cycle. That would equal 10x larger voltage drop compared to pure sinusoidal load which appears always as 100% duty cycle load.</p>
<p>PFC circuit can be used to rectify AC more efficiently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
